TEXTS
 

The Felix Show. The game consists of never giving up dreaming.2006
The Felix Show. The game consists of never giving up dreaming.2006

David Barro

Curator y crítico de arte


I start writing these lines straight, with the only impertinence of an austere photography which shows Félix Fernández with his nose hit (or operated) and wearing a white t-shirt. At the same time, he confesses aloud and in writing being sensitive to beauty. The image turns out to be round, effective and for sure, we could reveal through it his secrets, which are not secrets but truths that, as far as I understand, need to transpire.

The picture hides the sadness kept behind a clown’s nose or the loneliness, aftermath of celebrity, of excessive success. Our need to appear, once again, in the yellow press or to be just as we think others want us to be has grown bigger. And that is a great reason to get a broken nose, even by both sides.

Some time ago I referred to Félix Fernández’s works as sociological documents on a precise conduct and as opposition to imposition, as a search for sense. Félix Fernández does not camouflage like a flâneur for this search. The other way round, he shows off up to excess, he unfolds, he multiplies, he deconstructs himself. Just as in Joe Dallesandro’s Trash, he shows himself perfectly in order to understand the search means the wait.

In his Sensible a la belleza (sensitive to beauty) photography, Félix Fernández waits proudly, sure of his beauty as that mythic Ophelia in the portrait by Millais who floats alive (never drowned, noted Mallarmé) before the disaster turned to idyllic landscape. Rimbaud described her as follows: ‘¡Oh, pale Ophelia, as beautiful as snow!’. As in The Félix Show, everything consists of never giving up dreaming.

Let us think about why children never want to go to bed, or drunkards who persist in going on before an everlasting night utopia.

The wish of being able to keep on looking, dreaming, makes everything move in the shape of extreme need, just like a nightwalker who needs going on dreaming not to plunge onto the floor, as Nietzsche would say. For Félix Fernández waking up from that fortunate permanent dream, from that represented euphoria, would mean plunge onto the floor as shown in his dog-man, twisted over himself, dying in his sexuality ruined by others. That is why Félix keeps on being sensitive to beauty, with that impassive gesture, proud. His whole work bends from the conflict between the individual and society, to end up activating a kaleidoscopic truth on feelings which brushes schizophrenia.

But, “In the dreamer’s dream, the dreamed one awoke’ as Borges expresses in his fiction entitled ‘Las ruinas circulares’ (Circular Ruins) included in El jardín de los senderos que se bifurcan (The garden of the bifurcating paths). I wonder what would happen if that sensitive to beauty man just gave up being sensitive.
There is a vital need to transvestite reality in order to brush a decadent (for sure) subversion. Félix Fernández may think glamour is above all and like Warhol, he tries to build his own set to reinforce that longing; ‘I just want to be something when I am at a party’s entrance and I need to be able to come in’ affirmed Andy Warhol. And Félix also wants his own show.
Let us think now about the film The Truman Show, where the main character is at the same time the main character in a successful TV show not being aware of that. His life is the plot of both the TV series and everything surrounding him including his friends and his wife who are fake for they are actors. The city he lives in is a huge set. As a result it shows an ‘American’ style brand new world, an artificial and a little bowl one. Truman was born ‘live’ and he was almost killed ‘live’. The only thing that matters is just that, the live action, the audience. That is not very far from the passion exhibitionism Félix Fernández plans in some pictures belonging to the series 1.000 maneras de dormir tranquilo (1.000 ways of sleeping calmly). Félix stages his own burial, his Arnolfini style wedding, his sleep... And also how, just like Truman, he is being recorded by several video cameras. Félix Fernández as a character also longs to be a television hero out of nothingness.

As Truman, Félix Fernández starts to wonder about the world he lives in, the recurrent actions, the coincidences. Is ours a perfect world? Plato interpreted the world as an imperfect representation, a representation made up through our own ideology. At the end of the film, Truman takes pains to break that aseptic and superficial perfection and runs the risk before a world which is much worse than the one he lives in, as sort of a ‘creator god’ warns him; meanwhile his audience, so loyal during so many years, just wonder about the programme next: if we are not on TV, we just are not.

The question of law would be the following: Do we accept everything we watch?. Truman’s world provides us with some hints in sinister humour style: his teacher discourages him making him think everything is already done, the travel agency print ads show planes pierced by rays and a warning: ‘This could happen to you’... Truman accepts that, he does not think about all those contradictions. Just like us in our everyday life. We do not understand things may not be as we are told they are.

Every action Félix carries out are the consequence of a built narration though they seem sort of an improvised performance.

A narration of resistance before the contradictions mentioned above: ‘It is not the same thing to see how a typhoon comes standing up than to do it sitting down’, he said in an interview with José Manuel Lens. The sentence could be applied to our attitude when watching television. Félix grafts his critic vision in kind of a Derrida style deconstruction in his work Prime Time, a faltering tale pointing a broken, fake and strange looking television set. Starting from a series of arrogant speeches, silences, attempts and pauses. As in those programmes which show television highlight moments, Félix Fernández takes the spectator to a dizzy story with a clear apocalyptic message with disguised pornography, effervescent wars made fizzy drink ads, a football match spectators pointed as protagonists by the players themselves, and fortune tellers ascertaining our future. As I have already pointed, the bottom line of Félix Fernández’s discourse is the senseless search of sense, the experimentation which allows us to explain our strategy, to straighten our way thanks to the questioning of everything surrounding us and doubting before every image.

Television provided the raw material for this whole work, however, the cynical eyes of journalistic double standards stuck to it in an absurd censor attack which reminds me the American nonsense regarding Michael Jackson’s sister’s slippery boob (I think her name is Janet) which knocked out the Superbowl. I was in my way to a wedding when I saw a newspaper’s culture section page dedicated to boobs (much bigger, of course) Félix Fernández had torn apart from his corset just like Justin Timberlake did to poor Janet, who later confessed having rehearsed the action. The text for the local paper La Voz de Galicia written by Rubén Santamarta reads as follows: “More than a spectator did not wait to read the credits and abandoned the venue, blushed, before the end. It was not displayed, neither at the beginning nor at the end any explicit content warning. There was neither any warning outside the hall Prime time was shown nor in the foyer where the exhibition was announced. Only a single reference in the brochures explains the audience would find a story with a ‘clearly apocalyptic message, in disguised pornography’. Everything fine but in that emphasis on the audience (word the journalist repeats redundantly along the whole text), the mass media (I’m sure there were more news readers than audience at the exhibition) was not taken into account when illustrating the piece with the image of that porn actress who made him be so restless. Which attitude is more provocative? The work in the end had mucho mere sense, if possible, demonstrating the ambivalence of communication also in written form.

Félix Fernández entitled that individual exhibition for the Torrente Ballester Centre ‘Descent’, advising it meant to be ‘a conscience point after chaos provided that the fact of stating a descent implies the knowledge of an upper vital stage, being this previous or subsequent’. In short, a baroque decline in agreement with the instability of the world we live in, which is so hungry of certainties.

This way, the body Félix Fernández always displays, which is the ground of his whole work, is not anything else but the skin of fear, of success, of injustice and over all, the skin of the doubts and the nerves of those willing to be accepted by those willing to be accepted. All that can be found in his words in the performance carried out in the Sala San Hermenegildo in Sevilla, in the Contenedores 05 Festival: "... I hope nerves do not betray me and show a wrong image of what I really am. Live acts are like this, a normal risk of the auto-construction of ourselves we all have. Imagine I get covered in a rash’. What would everyone think about us? This question turns out constantly in the work or feelings strip-tease proposed by Félix Fernández. Everything is a kind of trompe l’oeil or make-up that ends up building a reality.
Even though the words written here are nothing else but introductory words for a character who fights against imposition and lies, able to satirise about social shame and the need we suffer to overcome time. Félix Fernández starts a trip to the depths of his conscious feeling about the fragility we feel before the loss of a reference. ‘Hold my hand and take me to somewhere interesting’, he states in one of his works. Even so, someone may think it is about an eccentric person, when our artist is not anything else but a weirdo who goes up and down (weirdo meaning clearly a scarce good) playing the game of never giving up dreaming.




CATHODE IDENTITY : On Félix Fernández’s video work. 2006


Javier Duero
Independent Curator


I know Félix since some years now. The person and the artist. We are not friends but we have managed to establish some understanding codes based on creative and intellectual inputs which are pleasant to share and truly, much more interesting than any conventional friendship.
Without any kind of emotional servitude I’m preparing to approach a complex world, rich in shades and dense in inspiring sources.

The body as a map, the gender as motto of a new identity, the own self as the ecosystem needed for survival, the environment whose maintenance relies on all of us, the mass-media and their power of transformation of modern societies; these are just a few of the subjects researched by this artist whose smile is everlasting and creative keenness striking.

There is no person without a body. Our body is the support of our identity and both the physical aspect and visual appearance are part and parcel of it. Through the imaginary representation of the body, it is put in the context of time and space. I mean the symbolic, metaphoric, mythic, organic, political body; the polyhedral vision Félix applies to every frame shot aiming the investigation of one of his main work lines, the one dealing with the concepts of body intelligence and the authority it exercises on our own imaginary one.

Our thought, the way we understand the world, is metaphoric. The body is the complement in support format for the changes of identity, for the disguise and the deceit. The performance art is a way of lending the body for the construction of different identities on it.
This discipline plays an important role in Félix Fernández’s video work being the artist both, subject and object of the action. This is shown as the plot of fictions which establish a speech or a concrete idea. It has nothing to do with documenting an action, it is about telling a story, almost a way of understanding existence. It is not an improvised technique with experimental features, but a very well cared for technique shown with apparent simplicity. Félix does not need post production resources, filters, layers, effects, etc. in order to make us quiver. As the excellent producer he is, he knows that a well reverse shot or a sequence shot in the precise moment of the script can settle the story in a narrative way. The rejection of just-for-show-elements, of superficial effects, of kitsch, and sometimes even to colour make him an expert artist in telling intense stories from a formal minimalism certified by the ignorance his camera pays to this new technology and the great amount of possibilities it offers on image manipulation.

Taking as a starting point the idea of identity having a cognitive component in relation with social representations and other affective component dealing with a feeling of being part of the different established groups, we can say that the identity of an individual is made up by a number of variables that are deeply and intimately related to one another. Sexuality is the nucleus on which each of these variables develop with the detail that it pierces through the individual, making it up in a special fashion.

The research on sexual identity in Félix’s work brushes several disciplines because the only way of getting a whole vision of a complex phenomenon is approaching it from different points of view. There have been many disciplines and theoretic trends which have approached sexual identity. Its influence range from the Greek mythology to Freud and Lacan. If we had to define a feature dealing with this subject shared by Felix’s video work it would be the normality and absolute acceptance of oneself. There are neither pretentious queer elements, nor queer flags or pink dogmas. The artist make each of his works a social statement with poetic and manner elements presented with such an intellectual honesty and narrative transparency (with is truly welcome).

We live in a consumer society which offers new ways of individuality. The level of the big mass, to behave well, mean consuming a great deal. The index of consumption is the index of a country’s health. Consumption is aimed to average individuals which are the image of consumers. We can watch fictitious speakers on television but they play a very important role for consumers. From the Amazonian jungle or from his flat’s room Felix reminds us about the lack of conciliation between our development system and the environment, between us as consumers and us, as inhabitants of the planet earth.

There is a constant overestimation of the style favoured by the media. From a point of view the ones on the screen enjoy a much stronger way of existing and millions of people can feel it. There is where the feeling about existence requiring living through image standards comes from. The best way to capture audiences is making them think they have the chance to be on television. That’s the reason why reality shows have such a success.

In his video work Félix questions the role of media which determine that instant character of communication as one of the factors helping broadcast that idea according to which, history has reached its end and there is nothing left to imagine but what already exists. That role devotes to the feeling of spiritual disenchantment the new generations suffer. There is nothing in store for the future, there are not any enthusiastic prospects, which is surprising because for Félix, in the end, we have everything to discover as individuals. Everything is reversible.

 

In the search for the place of my body: the end-development-end novels by Félix Fernández. 2006


Xosé Manuel Lens
Curator and crítico de arte


My body is arranged open, broad and controlled. It’s a topography which makes use of the wind to swing, of the periphery to dodge, of time, of soil, of that screen made on society in which I may exteriorise with my skin and attitudes. Each work carried out by Félix Fernández gather a place of the body in the map of society, of the outer side but from an inner positioning. Its time, recreational and constant, deceives and scatters in photographic, performance, video and installation works. And also in sculptures being fed from the deepest place of doubt, of life, of the tempest of an impossible to survive fall. Before finishing this text I possibly stop believing decadence is used as a monitoring profile; by now I enjoy thinking of the glitter of passion, of drama, I keep on breathing in blows while it is going down the curtain from a theatre where a defeat agent made his performance, narration doubt. The narration and the dramaturgy.

Today, not pretending to escape from a body art label, which can also be, we think about the critic writer who goes against the tide in that state that instructs the casualty’s best goal, in the open and fused impulse between both, the will to externalise and the will of plucking a personal language. Part by part, the body first, then the adjectives, the pronouns, the adverbs and the rest of edible conjunctions. Part by part; narrative fragments delivered in recreated instalments, ideas from a script projected in a controlled way whose only witness is my body. They are the positions, the readings and the interpretations are the second looks of this itinerary; today I place myself in front of the mirror while I observe myself behind it, while I examine my back. I become reversible in two different ways; Today I dig in a land owned by others, at night; Today I keep an eye on myself, armoured in the four cardinal points; today I imagine a white party to fight in a collective; today the map of my anatomy seems a black box hoping to be opened, strolling by the so-called creative career course. Perhaps today, again, the main character understands the reason for my doubts: where does uncertainty dwell?

‘By the arms, and also by the legs,
and, if it is not possible, by the head,
the camera picks up the moment.
What had made you stop looking at me?
By hits and audacity
Get it, get to the floor and drag me.
From the angle,
In the charming surface,
Following the cruel outline, get to the floor and move’


Virgilio Piñera. La Isla en peso

Damages, erosions, destructions, guilt and captures; neither wakefulness nor resignations. The reason of damages drinks from your vital signs; in your senses, in the myths you need to wait for: the narration, the poetry, the harmony of perfection or beauty. In its search dwells the direction of those who see you as an artist today. That is why Félix tries that everything is projected from the attempt, from that feeling of the ones who try to become, of the man who works daily while others place labels to cover, to get through. That is why perhaps we cannot think of individual works. And his work grouping in series make condense that apparently actual place mankind takes up in life and in life possibilities. The place and the human; the stage and the character. The artist and the occupation. I insist: there is time left to dodge labels and even other one that is not afraid of them.

We imagine an established script, Black boxes, from a sketch surrounding mankind action, its traces and secondary roles recorded and played from a sign (in concrete time and space) which is a stage design that opens itself in order to show its doubts and desires, causes and satellites that today while I write, walk or hit, nourish my body, my black box.
I think about my body from long time ago while I fake a wound on my nose and place myself on a bed with a woman singing or policemen guarding; I hit my neither tattooed nor marked body so that I can let that the things surrounding me today, where I perform, be the things that send messages to the audience. Without kisses for a suggestive environment. You surround your bed with iron pillars on its parts, forever fragmented, then you take back the same polarity for the installation of the trace, of the metaphor of fracture, of that guardless guard, without corners but now with building site fences. Feelings of loss, of storage and memory, perhaps not far from works by Félix González-Torres or Pepe Espalíu, in that detailed and impulsive meeting with metaphor, with the extension to the sculpture that recreates an experience. We can even pick Robert Gober not forgetting to label an absent, thoughtful body with dirty boots in the middle of a room, in front of a fan, while we listen.
“Body control represents an expression of social control.

The time of heroes and fixed and unalterable visions has passed away. Now we can only find subjects, sort of defeated and lacking certainty in search of new representations’
José Miguel García Cortés, Walks between love and death.

One of the reasons for my body to act comes from the narrative fact, in that shadow fragment that works move involving the viewer from literal and symbolic positions. That is why Black boxes refers to the plot of the abstract, of the group of works deliberately organised in order to become public, which are grouped together under a common denominator of the same signature; that in-between stage always used in the open ending chapters novel, as happens with diaries which are named to indicate the present time, pure present time. The plots by Félix Fernández stem from that personal field that evolves with the work on which those fates of margins almost featured, almost thrown are placed. The best displayed black box is always my body on which I place my doubts, my desires.

The White party, the celebration of the exceptional and the daily. The margins of realities that get filled with facts from the social field; They are those imagined fascinations from the apparently elegant, from a past recreated with music and atmosphere.

I travel across my guarded, armoured body. I travel across the outline of my life while I name each and every pole: east, south, north and west that draw the four parts that mark my outline. One, two, three and four parts; perhaps we think in the way Leonardo did reaching the human being proportions, perhaps in Klein’s taking the absurd, as Nauman, as fifth measure; neither great calculation nor great conquests are defined anymore. Measure, control, keep on being the side of my body demanded by society creating a shell, creating an image cloth, as before when playing the role of policemen in order to be observed, so that I could be armoured; I always have anatomy to try, never to reach, it remains as an essay, as a prototype.

The thousand ways of sleeping calmly which surrounded a photographic series were worth to conform, as we see, a strongly narrative will of an actor and his space. A context, always a place where the viewer’s look can be altered, but the protagonist is always the same. I check the looks on the body without puberty’s evidence but with the daily conquer of that who is fed with doubts and attempts and transvestites to get freed in that meeting with the graph paper of a body’s topography under the blankets, in front of the green landscape, near an Arnolfini married couple. Me with myself; me and my mirror project; me and my fiction. That is why we also go over the recovering of their bodies as materials, as sketch channels in Carolee Schneemann, Ana Mendieta, Dieter Appelt or Vito Aconcci, in John Coplans, Pierrick Sorin; in Álex Francés, Lucas Samaras or Ixone Sádaba.

We find our place in a non dominating space the same way we stir the search of an imagined book or dream of the search for a truth manifesto. The search for the place. Permanence, in that relationship of mankind with its time made land, with its search place. The catching of an answer, an explanation. That constant digging with the water reaching our knees while we keep on taking out sand and mud. Our back is hit by the ruins of the past that today is a stage design for the night. Ruins, damage; Our thinking of descent, of falling, of the digging on a land that picks us up to continue is not casual. That memory placed in the black box. The video witnessing this Permanence thinks of the look from the poetic side insisting in that month long narration while body and time, ruin and trace, when left itself to waste.
The works by Félix Fernández exist from the feeling of making a complex stage design; halos of a wider component. For that reason each show or installation is carefully examined to make grow higher the degrees of intention addressed to the viewer. This way, an isolated bed controls the viewer’s look from the very moment they enter the room. Then the visual bipolarity (body, water and sand) as in Armoured conforms the look only with the impatience game already beaten and the achievement of the beginning and end-beginning script. That reverse as in the video projections where a Goya style human fight is simulated on a horizontal mirror in the open surface. His works will be prototypes before sculptures, fragments and means, video players or set up monitors, or buildings to shelter.

I must admit that when I started writing this text I placed some books by my side so that I could look them up and let them warn me about their content. I wanted them to be my pillars in my search for some kind of vacuum. For, I must also admit, I identify Félix’s work with my preferred readings, with my daily obsessions which I, instead of making them photographs, remain looking for explanations in readings and facts. Because I think this narrator’s production is as those who make use of the body expression daily, as those who clean themselves, take a shower or have lunch thinking of the prolongation of the work close to life, to daily acts. After that, he deals with the cleaning off excesses and present it in a referential will, argued, critic and active; there it comes my morning reading, going over Goya and Leopardi.

“I let myself drop before the mirrors judgement.”
Carlos Negro. Héleris

Now see how the stage design made people think of masques and telluric membranes disposed on the truth! The full sincerity of this acting resides in the way of narrating from his own body, his own life spaces, his doubt arguments, his own works. Reconstruction in black, just as Reversible, get stuck to the work like a second skin in that duality of mirror and protagonist in the inner spaces; the fingerprints on the face, the strokes that drive me and identify me on the street. Finger and fingerprint, signature of the personal, reinforcement of the sincere intention.

Now see how your stage design knew about common places, being in this moment, while I look around the reversed intimate landscape’s colour black box, showing the exaggerated, altered side, the anti hero side of that who plays the main role in his own exhibition extending his own life and the experience given by the years. In objects in the self portraits room, in that self fiction that covered by biography, from Lugo, Viveiro, Celeiro and Madrid, covered by flesh and skin. Definitively, the stage design before exhibition, and fiction before writing, of the novel from some years ago, while and during 2006. Miradas Virxes (Virgin looks), Latitudes, Plugged Umplugged or Malas Artes(Bad arts); Feedback, Observatori or Lengua blanca (White tongue); refuelling stop remnants, in the art of impulses’s hostel. The black boxes as unavoidable aerial reference elements that keep the route memory, of a definite travel; they are nomad archives of unavoidable direction: save for the future. Today means present and the main character is my body that travels across places, uncertainty spaces, in that dimension marked by the places left to know, the experiences left to live, everything with the suspense of the fact of plaiting the lived things and those passed through; the body that dwells and doubts. In-between stage.

I thought of the present before, before, as an own particle which defines the beginning of these paragraphs written in pieces of desk, kitchen and library, corridor and window, surrounded by two cats and a walker who from now on finishes this days long chapter and thinks of an actor in the training period, articulating himself, rehearsing. Perhaps it is something obvious and easy to understand. Falling back on the food of the outline in order to knock on the immediate door. Perhaps it is the way Félix Fernández works, sincere project in process. An author who, by the way, was born looking at the north, where Lugo loses its solid ground line which I found one day in the afternoon on my way home coming back from a bookshop where I had bought an old edition of one of those books we always remember, Les fleurs du mal. That is why I always identify Félix with afternoons, always thinking that this narration, self portraits writer has something of a poet, something of against the tide murmur, of moved body, of broken narration, of art-life nomad. Attempts, maybe.

Texts about some video pieces of Félix Fernández. 2006


Carlos T.Mori
Curator


A new space

““Then took they the body of Jesus, and wound it in linen clothes with the spices, as the manner of the Jews is to bury.”

Gospel of St. John, 19:40.


From an intimate game with the white blankets we can see the artist stripped and sheltered between those two flexible planes. The blankets divide the screen hiding and showing his body through the white cloth. Those flesh fragments, when merging with the folds, create images of organic landscapes in which the blankets caress him as wandering thoughts. The heart beat calms before the inner landscape abstraction, longing own worlds and intimacy. Metaphoric landscapes live together with subtle inserts of the image of a beach and sometimes, palm tree waste, moving him away from noise. Thoughts that suggest the visual route in the video between the folds made up by the activity of his stripped body.

The blanket’s textures are syntactic pauses.

The viewer, after witnessing the set, the landscape and releasing later, pays attention to the fragmented aspects through a way out which follows a guideline shown by the blankets. The artist, isolated between the blankets, seems a restless ghost or spirit; or a sick person who keeps away from the outside world; or a foetus that frolics longing the uterus, longing purity; and records itself as a sample of a self assent act. The space provided by the bed is treated as a way out hole, somehow claustrophobic but worthy for the artist/spirit/sick person/foetus as a way to be with himself in a self imposed and tranquillising isolation.
But this shroud of love and light when shared can become torture in loneliness for this keeps their smell, the traces of his body, the memory of a partner. As we have seen in previous works by Félix Fernández, the poetic traces are an excuse of social and emotional doubts. We can relate this work with both, his video entitled ‘Reversible’ in rapport with the fight with himself as a precious crisis and with his later work ‘Mimeomai’ where after the inner cleaning, the artist becomes one with the wild nature surrounding him.



Test #1: on creation

“Go back to your loneliness, brother, and take your tears with you. I love him whose will is creating something beyond himself and for it, he passes away".

Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘Thus Spake Zarathustra’.

Taking the song ‘Karma police’ by Radiohead (and a text by Friedrich Nietzche) as a starting point, one summer day the artist improvised a dance. Still camera, static framing, his own bedroom. Dressed up with white pants and images from his personal archive. An own stored-memory-cleaning ritual: recordings of potential memories from his immediate environment which are never watched but when they are to be shared and forgotten.

In the video ‘TEST #1: on creation’ the artist finds out in his nakedness his inner space, both through the dancing and the inserts of outer landscapes in the way of feelings: a loose hose moving driven by its own water spurt, a storm which gets fragmented and progresses, the sea (the sea always as a metaphor for longing) and a burnt car being removed by the police. Both he and his recordings denote unstable moments. Moments which conform a search for the way which drive him to himself through some own sides discovered progressively.

Secluded to loneliness and lost in himself, for a minute, he demonstrates his right and strength to tempt such a task. curiously yearning for, seeing what the others can see through the pyres, the external strained moments which cross his personal dance, in his own body acknowledgement, in the act of creator. A fierce self demand giving everything he can and knowing it is not enough. But in his creation from intimacy as we could witness in other works of his, the worst enemy turning up will always be the same.

An individual fight for his own perfection and recognition in society where past experiences set the guideline. A lonely challenge and retreat, with his loving and creating, followed not long after by a reluctant justice. A silhouette, his own biography, which is never finished and is always doubt.